This comparison is different, coming from the point of view of a WordPress specialist.
JIRA vs Trello vs Asana vs TeamClerk vs WordPress: Conclusion
JIRA: Use it when working with a team on larger software projects, and if you’re utilizing things like scrum for managing your work.
Trello: Use it if you’re looking for a tool that you and your team can use for free, and that gives you ultimate freedom to manage your projects however you wish.
Asana: Use it if you expect your project management tool to introduce some structure into your workflow, and if you prefer list-based tools, rather than card-based.
TeamClerk: Use it to track your progress in real-time, and to get a good overview of a handful of projects running in parallel from the same dashboard.
Managing projects with WordPress + plugins: Not really.
Author = Karol K (codeinwp)
Always interesting to read a pro/con analysis between Waterfall & Agile methodologies.
It is easy to understand and manage as stages are clearly defined.
Meticulous record keeping and documentation.
Client knows what to expect. Client will have an idea of the size, cost and timeline for the project. The client will have a definite idea of what their product will do in the end.
In the case of employee turnover, waterfall’s strong documentation allows for minimal project impact
It often becomes rigid and resistant to change.
It relies heavily on initial requirements. However if these requirements are faulty in any manner, the project is doomed.
The whole product is only tested at the end. If errors are discovered late in the process, their existence may have affected the rest of the project.
The plan does not take into account a client’s evolving needs throughout the project cycle.
It allows for changes to be made after the initial planning stage. It follows client’s requirements changes.
It is easier to add features that will keep the product up to date with the latest developments in the industry.
At the end of each sprint, project priorities are evaluated. This allows clients to add their feedback, so that they ultimately get the product they desire.
The testing at the end of each sprint ensures that the errors are caught in each cycle.
This dynamic methodology is not suitable for processes that require a complex decision making of formal planning such as construction, manufacturing, military, health care system among others.
As the initial project does not have a definitive plan, the final product can be grossly different that what was initially intended.
Author = Liz Parody (Moove-it, via Medium)
Pair programming = a software development practice in which two programmers collaborate on a single workstation at the same time. This collaboration can be done either in person or remotely, in which case you’ll need software for screen sharing and real-time editing.
The Pros of Pair Programming
- Fewer mistakes and bugs
- Greater resiliency
- Increased code quality
- Faster training
- Improved team morale
The Cons of Pair Programming
- Higher costs
Conclusion = Pair programming isn’t new; it’s been around the software development industry for decades. As a practice, pair programming originates from the extreme programming (XP) methodology, which prioritizes high software quality and frequent tests and releases.
For some organizations, pair programming simply isn’t the right fit for their situation. However, a growing number of companies are finding that pair programming has a variety of benefits, including saved development time, higher-quality code, and better training and onboarding. As a result, everyone on the team is working together to build the most successful, best version of the product possible.
Author = Sam McDavid (Medium)